AI output is probabilistic; shipped software shouldn't be. So we don't hand you what the builder produced — we hand you what survived verification. Every build runs a verify → fix → re-verify loop before it's called done, and the verifiers are separate agents from the builder: a fresh set of eyes with no attachment to the code.
The layers
| Layer | What it checks |
|---|---|
| Code review | A read-only reviewer agent hunts real defects — broken logic, dead interactions, state bugs |
| Security audit | Injection surfaces, credential leaks, unsafe patterns in generated code |
| Links & SEO | Broken links, missing metadata, robots.txt and sitemap correctness |
| Accessibility | Automated axe-core pass — contrast, labels, keyboard navigation, ARIA misuse |
| Conformance | Does the build actually match what the plan promised? Pages, features, content |
| In-browser check | The build runs in a real browser; games get played, apps get exercised |
Findings get fixed, not filed
When a verifier finds something, the build doesn't come back to you with a bug list — the loop sends the findings to a fix pass and re-verifies, up to three rounds inside the build. Anything that must be fixed and still survives triggers an automatic follow-up fix run: a fresh builder invocation whose entire mission is the surviving findings, working on a clone of the build so the previous version stays untouched as a rollback point.
What you see
Each completed build carries its verification record — which layers ran, what was found, what was fixed, and anything advisory left for your judgment. It's the difference between "the AI finished" and "the build passed."
← All posts